Yes! Send me the FREE digital editions of Spa Business and Spa Business insider magazines and the FREE weekly Spa Business and Spa Business insider ezines and breaking news alerts!
KKP’s David McHendry discusses the benefits of choosing correctly-sized indoor sports facilities that work well for indoor sports and offer a sound business model for the operator
To meet participation targets and support athletes, NGBs need access to well specified, correctly-sized facilities
How large should a sports hall be in order to offer high-quality sporting opportunity and a decent, sustainable level of return for the operator? This is the question that Sport England has been seeking to address via its 2011 publication Developing the Right Sports Hall.
Specialists from the national governing bodies (NGBs) of netball, basketball, badminton, volleyball and cricket have come together to assess whether and how it is possible to specify at the core unit level – a space that enables each of the sports to be played at the requisite level of quality – and to set out the process that agencies should use to assess this.
Knight, Kavanagh and Page (KKP) – an independent specialist consultancy in sports, leisure, culture, regeneration and green spaces – was tasked by Sport England to prepare practical guidance on the sporting and business benefits of the proposed larger hall models. This included direct centre management and business planning expertise, work focused on management, programming and usage flexibility that new specifications may offer, as well as the accompanying fiscal benefits and sustainability.
One size fits all Historically, sports hall size evolved around the practical space required to accommodate four badminton courts and in general they have become larger and taller. When the old GB Sports Council’s Standardised Approach to Sports Halls (SASH) programme was rolled out in the early 1980s, the recommended specification for floor-space was 32m x 17m. This worked for badminton but left other sports somewhat cramped; the touchlines for a netball court were, for example, virtually on the skirting boards and there was little or no run off space for umpires, scorers, coaches and other team members.
However, these needs have since been addressed and so the 33m x 18m sports hall specification has become the norm.
Changing shape A key trigger for further change was the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme. This incorporated what was called Building Bulletin (BB) ‘98’ guidance which suggested that the minimum size for new school sports halls should be 33m x 18m (594sq m). This guidance was what both developers and the Local Education Partnerships (LEPs) then picked up on and specified.
However, halls of this size are now not considered to be fit for purpose for the key sports they serve and the prospect of allowing another generation of facilities that are just too small has helped Sport England broker an unprecedented level of co-operation among NGBs to develop mutually agreed specifications.
To meet participation targets, support clubs and leagues and enable talented athletes to train and compete, NGBs need access to properly specified, correctly-sized facilities. The proposed new core specification for community and school sports halls described in Sport England’s Developing the Right Sports Hall document can work for all of them and, at the base level, optimises potential cross-sports use and income generation.
Development of 4+ halls In seeking to change the core definition of what we understand to be an appropriate sports hall, Sport England’s document provides excellent technical detail about what is needed to accommodate the various main sports as they are played at present. It also makes reference to the options that developing various models of larger halls offer to the operator and people delivering recreational, competition or performance-based programmes in various sports. The document is accompanied by business planning and modelling spreadsheets to assist those considering the various scenarios available to them to do so with ease and confidence.
The new core unit (what we are calling the 4+ hall), at a capital cost not substantially greater than the old model, offers potentially excellent value for money and can bring significant community, educational, programming and, most importantly, sports development and participation increase benefits.
However, if schools, local authorities and other operators wishing to develop new or replace existing halls are to get the most out of their investment, consideration must be given to how they (plus clubs and NGBs themselves) look to innovate to seek to attract new participants and to make optimum use of the space they will have at their disposal.
Development of 4+ halls will allow (and should encourage) the smart club, league or operator of the future to take a market-led approach to promote positive, proactive centre programming and use with potentially valuable participation outcomes. Lessons can be learnt from the fact that five-a-side football was not invented by the FA but the market for it has expanded and developed in a sport that was already widely played in another format.
Turn up and play The larger core sports hall offers the imaginative venue manager ‘room for manoeuvre’. There is real opportunity to innovate. For school-based users, it can provide options to deliver new format games as part of the curriculum and an after-school offer. For those programming for the community, the additional space, some innovative court line markings and hall sub-division means that things can be done differently to break away from the static space filling habits that have led indoor football and more recently ‘wall-to-wall aerobics’ to dominate programming at the expense of other sports, because they generate, in relative terms, good levels of income and are relatively easy to sell.
Successful examples of ‘turn up and play’ volleyball are already filling various venues, while new more flexible forms of netball – suited to a small-sided format are being televised. Due to their adaptability these sports are becoming increasingly popular among those entering or ‘coming back’ to sport, while 2v2 and 3v3 basketball has been played for decades – just rarely in regular participation, structured drop-in and regular league based formats.
What we haven’t yet seen is these derivatives properly used to drive up participation numbers (and venue income). However, these correctly-sized facilities better meet the needs of mainstream sport and can accommodate safe and exciting turn-up-and-play innovations.
These have the potential to bring people into these sports (or keep them in) for longer, while ensuring the operator gets an appropriate return on investment. This, in turn, validates the investment in the extra space and the early stage effort needed to do things differently.
Developing the Right Sports Hall is available from the Sport England website: www.sportengland.org
David McHendry is a principal consultant at Knight, Kavanagh and Page. Email: [email protected]
Assess the market: * Current sports hall supply in the catchment * Sports hall stock condition * Technical quality/relevance/scale * Current use; fully occupied/spare capacity?
Sporting need: * Which sports do you want to cater for * At what level(s)? * Is there an NGB-identified need in the locality?
Sports status: * Levels of play in chosen sports * Facility(s) required to service this * Level of NGB technical specification required
Quantity: * How much use can you legitimately predict * ...in each sport? * ...at each level of competition/performance?
Specification: * Is there a facility in place – is it worth keeping? * What facility(s) is/are required? * What must the specification(s) be to cater for the levels of play and numbers predicted?
Does it stack up: * What will it cost to open/run/operate? * How much income will be generated? * Is the business plan sustainable?
Decision
To meet participation targets and support athletes, NGBs need access to well specified, correctly-sized facilities
One size fits (h)all :
The new core space will allow for indoor netball, basketball, badminton, volleyball and cricket
Contrast therapy, based on the alternation of hot and cold rituals, has become one of the
most valued practices in the fields of wellness and recovery. [more...]
The MSpa Oslo series is a perennial bestseller in global markets. With innovative
engineering and premium performance, this completely portable spa line-up is expertly
designed to meet the needs of customers worldwide. [more...]
+ More featured suppliers
COMPANY PROFILES
Seed To Skin
Founded by Jeanette Thottrup in 2018, in Tuscany, Seed to Skin is an award winning skincare line. [more...]
Fenix Group srl
Founded in Italy by Gianluca Cavalletti, Fenix Group introduced Endospheres with the aim of redefini [more...]
KKP’s David McHendry discusses the benefits of choosing correctly-sized indoor sports facilities that work well for indoor sports and offer a sound business model for the operator
To meet participation targets and support athletes, NGBs need access to well specified, correctly-sized facilities
How large should a sports hall be in order to offer high-quality sporting opportunity and a decent, sustainable level of return for the operator? This is the question that Sport England has been seeking to address via its 2011 publication Developing the Right Sports Hall.
Specialists from the national governing bodies (NGBs) of netball, basketball, badminton, volleyball and cricket have come together to assess whether and how it is possible to specify at the core unit level – a space that enables each of the sports to be played at the requisite level of quality – and to set out the process that agencies should use to assess this.
Knight, Kavanagh and Page (KKP) – an independent specialist consultancy in sports, leisure, culture, regeneration and green spaces – was tasked by Sport England to prepare practical guidance on the sporting and business benefits of the proposed larger hall models. This included direct centre management and business planning expertise, work focused on management, programming and usage flexibility that new specifications may offer, as well as the accompanying fiscal benefits and sustainability.
One size fits all Historically, sports hall size evolved around the practical space required to accommodate four badminton courts and in general they have become larger and taller. When the old GB Sports Council’s Standardised Approach to Sports Halls (SASH) programme was rolled out in the early 1980s, the recommended specification for floor-space was 32m x 17m. This worked for badminton but left other sports somewhat cramped; the touchlines for a netball court were, for example, virtually on the skirting boards and there was little or no run off space for umpires, scorers, coaches and other team members.
However, these needs have since been addressed and so the 33m x 18m sports hall specification has become the norm.
Changing shape A key trigger for further change was the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme. This incorporated what was called Building Bulletin (BB) ‘98’ guidance which suggested that the minimum size for new school sports halls should be 33m x 18m (594sq m). This guidance was what both developers and the Local Education Partnerships (LEPs) then picked up on and specified.
However, halls of this size are now not considered to be fit for purpose for the key sports they serve and the prospect of allowing another generation of facilities that are just too small has helped Sport England broker an unprecedented level of co-operation among NGBs to develop mutually agreed specifications.
To meet participation targets, support clubs and leagues and enable talented athletes to train and compete, NGBs need access to properly specified, correctly-sized facilities. The proposed new core specification for community and school sports halls described in Sport England’s Developing the Right Sports Hall document can work for all of them and, at the base level, optimises potential cross-sports use and income generation.
Development of 4+ halls In seeking to change the core definition of what we understand to be an appropriate sports hall, Sport England’s document provides excellent technical detail about what is needed to accommodate the various main sports as they are played at present. It also makes reference to the options that developing various models of larger halls offer to the operator and people delivering recreational, competition or performance-based programmes in various sports. The document is accompanied by business planning and modelling spreadsheets to assist those considering the various scenarios available to them to do so with ease and confidence.
The new core unit (what we are calling the 4+ hall), at a capital cost not substantially greater than the old model, offers potentially excellent value for money and can bring significant community, educational, programming and, most importantly, sports development and participation increase benefits.
However, if schools, local authorities and other operators wishing to develop new or replace existing halls are to get the most out of their investment, consideration must be given to how they (plus clubs and NGBs themselves) look to innovate to seek to attract new participants and to make optimum use of the space they will have at their disposal.
Development of 4+ halls will allow (and should encourage) the smart club, league or operator of the future to take a market-led approach to promote positive, proactive centre programming and use with potentially valuable participation outcomes. Lessons can be learnt from the fact that five-a-side football was not invented by the FA but the market for it has expanded and developed in a sport that was already widely played in another format.
Turn up and play The larger core sports hall offers the imaginative venue manager ‘room for manoeuvre’. There is real opportunity to innovate. For school-based users, it can provide options to deliver new format games as part of the curriculum and an after-school offer. For those programming for the community, the additional space, some innovative court line markings and hall sub-division means that things can be done differently to break away from the static space filling habits that have led indoor football and more recently ‘wall-to-wall aerobics’ to dominate programming at the expense of other sports, because they generate, in relative terms, good levels of income and are relatively easy to sell.
Successful examples of ‘turn up and play’ volleyball are already filling various venues, while new more flexible forms of netball – suited to a small-sided format are being televised. Due to their adaptability these sports are becoming increasingly popular among those entering or ‘coming back’ to sport, while 2v2 and 3v3 basketball has been played for decades – just rarely in regular participation, structured drop-in and regular league based formats.
What we haven’t yet seen is these derivatives properly used to drive up participation numbers (and venue income). However, these correctly-sized facilities better meet the needs of mainstream sport and can accommodate safe and exciting turn-up-and-play innovations.
These have the potential to bring people into these sports (or keep them in) for longer, while ensuring the operator gets an appropriate return on investment. This, in turn, validates the investment in the extra space and the early stage effort needed to do things differently.
Developing the Right Sports Hall is available from the Sport England website: www.sportengland.org
David McHendry is a principal consultant at Knight, Kavanagh and Page. Email: [email protected]
Assess the market: * Current sports hall supply in the catchment * Sports hall stock condition * Technical quality/relevance/scale * Current use; fully occupied/spare capacity?
Sporting need: * Which sports do you want to cater for * At what level(s)? * Is there an NGB-identified need in the locality?
Sports status: * Levels of play in chosen sports * Facility(s) required to service this * Level of NGB technical specification required
Quantity: * How much use can you legitimately predict * ...in each sport? * ...at each level of competition/performance?
Specification: * Is there a facility in place – is it worth keeping? * What facility(s) is/are required? * What must the specification(s) be to cater for the levels of play and numbers predicted?
Does it stack up: * What will it cost to open/run/operate? * How much income will be generated? * Is the business plan sustainable?
Decision
To meet participation targets and support athletes, NGBs need access to well specified, correctly-sized facilities
One size fits (h)all :
The new core space will allow for indoor netball, basketball, badminton, volleyball and cricket
A new survey of UK and international spa practitioners shows that stress, burnout and
wellbeing concerns have caused one in three respondents to consider leaving the industry.
The UK's four Chief Medical Officers have published a refreshed edition of Physical activity
guidelines: UK Chief Medical Officers' report, updating the evidence that underpins the nation's
physical activity recommendations and placing greater emphasis on strength, balance, reducing
sedentary behaviour and, for the first time, supporting people taking weight loss medications.
Anna Bjurstam has left her role as Wellness Pioneer at Six Senses Hotels and Resorts and
launched a new wellness, longevity and “consciousness consultancy” called Wahayla.
Fairmont Cheshire, The Mere, has opened today (10 July) in the Northwest of England
with a
1,715sq m Fairmont Spa that has been designed using a ‘Wellness without Walls’
concept.
Wellness hotels generating less than US$1 million (€932,700, £785,200) – or 10 per cent of
total revenue from wellness and leisure – recorded the strongest RevPAR and TRevPAR growth
in 2025 across categories when compared with 2024, according to the latest Wellness Real
Estate Report by RLA Global, produced in partnership with P and L benchmarking firm HotStats.
Lefay Resorts, the portfolio of two luxury wellness properties in Italy, has added emotional
dance classes and group cold plunge sessions in response to market demand for social
connection.
Aditya Saluja, an industry leader in luxury wellness hospitality, has been
appointed as
commercial director of spa and wellness for the spa management division of
Minor Hotels,
MSpa International.
Contrast therapy, based on the alternation of hot and cold rituals, has become one of the
most valued practices in the fields of wellness and recovery. [more...]
The MSpa Oslo series is a perennial bestseller in global markets. With innovative
engineering and premium performance, this completely portable spa line-up is expertly
designed to meet the needs of customers worldwide. [more...]
+ More featured suppliers
COMPANY PROFILES
Seed To Skin Founded by Jeanette Thottrup in 2018, in Tuscany, Seed to Skin is an award winning skincare line. [more...]
